Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /home/customer/www/neverforum.com/public_html/fmpbo/include/parser.php on line 811

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/customer/www/neverforum.com/public_html/fmpbo/include/parser.php on line 814

26 Reply by themacmeister

  • themacmeister
  • themacmeister
  • NeverBall
  • Offline
  • From: Tasmania, Australia
  • Registered: 2005-04-16
  • Posts: 3,349

Re: Nokia N900?

Nice video, good framerates (considering NB fps).

Currently Playing:
Celeste and Electronic Super Joy

themacmeister's Website

27 Reply by nue

  • nue
  • nue
  • OccasionallyBall
  • Offline
  • From: Vienna, Austria
  • Registered: 2005-05-19
  • Posts: 555

Re: Nokia N900?

Looks excellent! And looks like NP is a good game for mobile devices gameplay-wise smile .


Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /home/customer/www/neverforum.com/public_html/fmpbo/include/parser.php on line 811

28 Reply by parasti

  • parasti
  • Developer
  • Offline
  • From: Latvia
  • Registered: 2005-06-18
  • Posts: 3,927

Re: Nokia N900?

BTW, I have a random nitpick about the release policy for the Maemo package. I had a similar issue with the iPhone/IPod port of 1.4.0.

I really don't appreciate custom builds hijacking our version numbers. Neverball 1.5.5 (which is how the Maemo package apparently calls itself) is a designation reserved for an official release that has not happened yet. It is confusing to suggest that the port is based on 1.5.5. Instead I recommend using a notion that makes it clear that it is based on a snapshot of development code, for example, by using an SVN revision number (perhaps combined with the latest released version which was 1.5.4).

(As a side note, adding to the confusion is the fact that 1.5.5 will never be released. The next version will warrant a version bump to 1.6.0.)

29 Reply by tonesfrommars

  • tonesfrommars
  • tonesfrommars
  • Administrator
  • Offline
  • From: Los Angeles, CA
  • Registered: 2005-08-08
  • Posts: 1,411

Re: Nokia N900?

@ parasti:  +1

mardy, how does the nokia do with golf jambalaya? towards the end there are some big elaborate high-lump count holes.

tonesfrommars's Website

30 Reply by mardy

  • mardy
  • AlwaysBall
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2011-06-29
  • Posts: 21

Re: Nokia N900?

parasti wrote:

I really don't appreciate custom builds hijacking our version numbers. Neverball 1.5.5 (which is how the Maemo package apparently calls itself) is a designation reserved for an official release that has not happened yet. It is confusing to suggest that the port is based on 1.5.5. Instead I recommend using a notion that makes it clear that it is based on a snapshot of development code, for example, by using an SVN revision number (perhaps combined with the latest released version which was 1.5.4).

Good point! I'll follow your suggestion. :-)

31 Reply by gjtorikian

  • gjtorikian
  • OftenBall
  • Offline
  • From: San Francisco, CA
  • Registered: 2010-04-26
  • Posts: 112

Re: Nokia N900?

parasti wrote:

BTW, I have a random nitpick about the release policy for the Maemo package...

Is it all right if the "custom builds" take their own version numbering scheme? E.g. starting at 1.0 and onwards?

32 Reply by parasti

  • parasti
  • Developer
  • Offline
  • From: Latvia
  • Registered: 2005-06-18
  • Posts: 3,927

Re: Nokia N900?

gjtorikian wrote:

Is it all right if the "custom builds" take their own version numbering scheme? E.g. starting at 1.0 and onwards?

Not really, but it depends. This is the issue I had with the iPhone port. If I do a Google search right now, the first result for "Neverball 1.0" is a review of the iPhone port. Surprisingly, the port is not based on the actual Neverball 1.0 release, it is based on 1.4, but it has permanently contaminated the search results for 1.0. I say "it depends" because if it had actually been called something like "Neverball ME 1.0" (i.e, a simple extension to the name), this would probably not be a problem. Ideally though it would be nice if ports accurately represented which version they are based on.

33 Reply by Lazrhog

  • Lazrhog
  • OftenBall
  • Offline
  • Registered: 2008-06-27
  • Posts: 120

Re: Nokia N900?

parasti wrote:
gjtorikian wrote:

Is it all right if the "custom builds" take their own version numbering scheme? E.g. starting at 1.0 and onwards?

Not really, but it depends. This is the issue I had with the iPhone port. If I do a Google search right now, the first result for "Neverball 1.0" is a review of the iPhone port. Surprisingly, the port is not based on the actual Neverball 1.0 release, it is based on 1.4, but it has permanently contaminated the search results for 1.0. I say "it depends" because if it had actually been called something like "Neverball ME 1.0" (i.e, a simple extension to the name), this would probably not be a problem. Ideally though it would be nice if ports accurately represented which version they are based on.

Yeah, sorry about that sad

The official neverputt I released was "Neverputt ME 1.4.1" though.  The iPhone neverball release never saw an official release at all.  It was just a "can it be done" exercise.  My bad, sorry


Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/customer/www/neverforum.com/public_html/fmpbo/include/parser.php on line 814

34 Reply by Cheeseness

  • Cheeseness
  • Cheeseness
  • Developer
  • Offline
  • From: Australia
  • Registered: 2006-06-03
  • Posts: 2,397

Re: Nokia N900?

Pet movers, eh? Could this be SPAM?

Cheese
==========
cheesetalks.net

Cheeseness's Website


Deprecated: Function create_function() is deprecated in /home/customer/www/neverforum.com/public_html/fmpbo/include/parser.php on line 756

35 Reply by dtb (edited by dtb 2011-09-06 08:07:11)

  • dtb
  • dtb
  • OccasionallyBall
  • Offline
  • From: Vienna, Austria
  • Registered: 2011-04-03
  • Posts: 576

Re: Nokia N900?

johnnilson wrote:

I have a lot about this smart phone.Its a kind of computer phone with 5 megapixel camera.

...somehow lacking in content and not quite contributing to this thread, so either bad google translation or spam

36 Reply by ht-never

  • ht-never
  • ht-never
  • OccasionallyBall
  • Offline
  • From: Italy
  • Registered: 2011-03-21
  • Posts: 901

Re: Nokia N900?

yes, i think this he is a dirty spammer

~DEV

37 Reply by dtb

  • dtb
  • dtb
  • OccasionallyBall
  • Offline
  • From: Vienna, Austria
  • Registered: 2011-04-03
  • Posts: 576

Re: Nokia N900?

hi ht,

we said it nearly the same time...

38 Reply by ht-never

  • ht-never
  • ht-never
  • OccasionallyBall
  • Offline
  • From: Italy
  • Registered: 2011-03-21
  • Posts: 901

Re: Nokia N900?

yes, you're right!

~DEV